This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. (February 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Film censorship is carried out by various countries to differing degrees, sometimes as a result of powerful or relentless lobbying by organizations or individuals. Films that are banned in a particular country change over time.
- 1 Rating systems
- 2 By country
- 3 Brief history
- 4 See also
- 5 References
- 6 Further reading
- 7 External links
A motion picture rating system is designated to classify films with regard to suitability for audiences in terms of issues such as sex, violence, substance abuse, profanity, impudence or other types of obscene content. A particular issued rating can be called a certification, classification, certificate.
Australia's Australian Classification Board (ACB), formerly known as the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC), uses the Commonwealth Classification Act 1995 as a guide for the majority of the censorship within the country; however, each state and territory is free to make additional legislation (see Censorship in Australia). Australia is regarded by many to be the most restrictive on film ratings of all Western democratic countries, considering its history and prolific "refusal of classification" (tantamount to banning in other countries) to certain films, although restrictions have eased over the years.
In practice, films still get a short cinematic run before they are reviewed and prevented from being shown at cinemas or released on DVD. This is not a comprehensive list; many films that have been previously banned are not mentioned here (however, some have since been released uncut on DVD). Also not included are the numerous pornographic films deemed too excessive to release under an X18+ category, which are refused classification by the ACB.
- During dictatorship (1964–1988)
During the dictatorship in Brazil, that last from 1964 to 1988, several films were banned under the Federal Law from Brazil 5536 from 1968. During several years a project was being developed to find and publish every document on censorship in films during the dictatorship. The project "Memory of Censorship in Brazilian Cinema" released in 2005 six thousand documents about 175 banned films during the dictatorship. And, finally, in 2007 they released documents for the last 269 films banned at that time.
- After democratization (1988–)
- 1993: Beyond Citizen Kane:
"On February 14, 2011, the newspaper Jornal do Brasil (quoting the network's spokesperson) reported that Rede Record would be broadcasting the documentary in 2011, on a date yet to be specified."
- 1976: Di Cavalcanti:
This film (short) about Di Cavalcanti was banned due a lawsuit open by Di Cavalcanti daughter, Elizabeth, in 1979. The film documented the wake and funeral of the Brazilian painter Di Cavalcanti. Since 1979 it can not be shown, at the request of his daughter Elizabeth through preliminary injunction granted by Justice, confirmed in 1983, for sentimental reasons tied with religious ideas. In 1985, the lawyer Felipe Falcon moved an action to reform the judgment, by proposing the dispossession of the film by the state on cultural grounds, to the detriment of the heirs of Di and Glauber. Yet with no solution in sight, Di Glauber must stay contained in a sealed box. 2004: In spite of everything, João Rocha ( director of Thuth Profane), nephew of the Glauber Rocha, has placed a copy on video on providers outside of Brazil: the internet users can make free downloads of the movie, proving that censor the cinema in digital age is useless.
- 2011: A Serbian Film:
A Serbian Film had its release in Brazil liberated on August 5, 2011. The exception is Rio de Janeiro estate, where the film was forbidden due a lawsuit filed by the Democrats political party, who claim that the pedophilia scenes infringe the part of the Brazilian Constitution that protects children (Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente). The case was overturned in 2012.
At present, only films containing prohibited material (such as child pornography) or under court order (such as libel or copyright infringement) are banned in Canadian provinces.
In Mainland China, film censorship, often on political grounds, is rampant. Films in Mainland China are used to be reviewed by the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television (SAPPRFT) (Chinese: 国家新闻出版广电总局) which dictated whether, when, and how a movie gets released. In 2018, the SAPPRFT was replaced by the National Film Administration (NFA) under the Publicity Department (Chinese: 国家电影局). The NFA is separate from the NRTA under the State Council (Chinese: 广电总局).
Main article: Censorship in the Federal Republic of Germany
Pre war and during the First World War
In 1906, the first legislation arose discussing the censorship of film and media.This was met with pushback, due to preexisting legislation regarding censorship of the media. The higher courts deemed the film censorship was indeed legal, however provided no guidance towards individual parts of Germany, creating discrepancies province to province.
In Germany, film censorship was abolished in 1918, however the Motion Picture Law (Lichtspielgesetzof) in 1920 created film review boards which were used to screen films that may perpetrate a negative image of Germany to the rest of the world.
In India, films are censored by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), a statutory censorship and classification body under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. Films should be certified by the board to publicly exhibit it in India, including films shown in television. CBFC is considered to be one of the most powerful censor boards in the world due to its strict ways of functioning.
All films depicting anything deemed contrary to Islamic morals are banned outright in Iran.
Due to the small size of Ireland, films banned by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) were rarely even submitted for release in Ireland, due to the high costs of promotion and distribution for such a small audience. Similarly, BBFC cuts are often left in DVD releases, due to the difficulties in separating the two film supplies.
This changed in 2000; many of these films have since been unbanned and rated anywhere from PG to 18. During the review process it was decided that no more films would be banned for either theatre or video release, but some bans are still in place. Banned films can still be viewed at private members' clubs with 18+ age limits.
During the Apartheid regime, films depicting interracial couples were banned and/or censored for content - the James Bond films Live and Let Die and A View To A Kill had love scenes which were censored by the South African government.
According to the Internet Movie Database, there are no currently-banned films in South Korea.
In recent years, sexual scenes have been a major issue that pits filmmakers against the Media Rating Board. Pubic hair and male or female genitalia are disallowed on the screen, unless they are digitally blurred. In rare cases extreme violence, obscene language, or certain portrayals of drug use may also be an issue. Korea has a five level rating systems; G, PG-12, PG-15, PG-18 and Restricted.
The infamous video nasty list was created in 1982 to protect against obscenity. Films on this list were banned and distributors of said films were liable to be prosecuted (some of the films were banned before the list was made). This list banned 74 films at one point in the mid-1980s; the list was eventually trimmed down, and only 39 films were successfully prosecuted. Most of the films (even of the 39 successfully prosecuted) have now been approved by the BBFC, cut or uncut (see Video Recordings Act 1984).
The United States has no federal agency charged with either permitting or restricting the exhibition of motion pictures. Most instances of films being banned are via ordinances or proclamations by city or state governments. Some are instances of films being judicially found to be of an obscene nature and subject to specific laws against such material (i.e., child pornography). Such findings are usually only legally binding in the jurisdiction of the court making such a ruling.
The established film industry in the United States began a form of self-censorship in the late 1920s called the Motion Picture Production Code to forestall any possible formation of a federal censoring agency. In 1968, the Production Code was superseded by the MPAA film rating system. The rating system is broken down into five categories and each have a respective definition. They are G (General Audiences; All ages admitted), PG (Parental Guidance Suggested; Some material may not be suitable for children), PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned; Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13), R (Restricted; Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian), and NC-17 (No one under 17 admitted). It was created by Jack Valenti in 1968. In addition to providing film ratings, the MPAA also lobbies Congress, helps in international promotion of the U.S. film industry, and piracy protection.
Film censorship, the control of the content and presentation of a film, has been a part of the film industry almost as long as it has been around. The activists of current society continue to broaden the First Amendment rights for the film industry allowing the art to be restricted to a certain limit. In fact, Britain established film censorship in 1912 and the United States followed a decade later. Other early efforts of censoring the film industry include the Hays Code of 1922 and the Motion Picture Production Code of 1930.
- "Lei nº 5.536, de 21 de Novembro de 1968 - 5536/68 :: Legislação::Lei 5536/1968 (Federal - Brasil)". Lexml.gov.br. Retrieved 2013-04-22.
- ":. Memória Cine Br ". Memoriacinebr.com.br. Archived from the original on 2013-07-28. Retrieved 2013-04-22.
- "Documentário vira arma de Record contra Globo - Terra Brasil". Diversao.terra.com.br. Retrieved 2013-04-22.
- "Record compra direitos de documentário sobre a Rede Globo - Portal IMPRENSA". Portalimprensa.uol.com.br. 2009-08-20. Archived from the original on 2009-08-26. Retrieved 2013-04-22.
- "Record exibirá Muito Além do Cidadão Kane | Blog da Cidadania". Blogcidadania.com.br. Retrieved 2013-05-11.
- Jornal do Brasil (2011-02-14). "Jornal do Brasil - JB Premium - Muito além do cidadão Marinho". Jb.com.br. Retrieved 2013-04-22.
- "Glauber sem censura - Paraná-Online - Paranaense como você". Pron.com.br. 2013-01-19. Retrieved 2013-04-22.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-07-08. Retrieved 2013-09-24.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "CENSORED FILMS IN BRAZIL, 1908-1988 | DIÁRIO CINEMATOGRÁFICO". Meucinediario.wordpress.com. 2012-07-31. Retrieved 2013-04-22.
- "'A Serbian Film' é liberado em todo Brasil, menos no Rio de Janeiro". 5 August 2011. Retrieved 23 September 2017.
- "Quase um ano depois, A Serbian Film é liberado em todo o Brasil". Retrieved 23 September 2017.
- "国家新闻出版署（国家版权局）、国家电影局揭牌". people.cn. April 16, 2018.
- Mühl-Benninghaus, Wolfgang. “German Film Censorship during World War I.” Film History, vol. 9, no. 1, 1997, pp. 71–94. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/3815292.
- Birgel, Franz A. (2009). "Kuhle Wampe, leftist cinema, and the politics of film censorship in Weimar Germany" Check
|url=value (help). Historical Reflections / Réflexions Historiques. 35 (2): 40–. ISSN 0315-7997.
- Israel lifts total ban on German films. Canadian Jewish Chronicle Review. 14 April 1967.
- "List of banned films in South Korea". The Internet Movie Database. Retrieved 2010-12-17.
- Wittern-Keller, Laura. Freedom of the Screen: Legal Challenges to State Film Censorship. University Press of Kentucky, 2008.
- "The Motion Picture Production Code" (PDF).
- Nalkur, Priya G.; Jamieson, Patrick E.; Romer, Daniel (November 2010). "The Effectiveness of the Motion Picture Association of America's Rating System in Screening Explicit Violence and Sex in Top-ranked Movies From 1950 to 2006". Journal of Adolescent Health. 47 (5): 440–7. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.019. PMID 20970078.
- Dunlop, Alison J. (2017-04-20). "The Famously Little-Known Gottlieb Muffat". In Talle, Andrew (ed.). Bach Perspectives, Volume 9: J. S. Bach and His German Contemporaries. 1. University of Illinois Press. doi:10.5406/illinois/9780252038136.003.0004. ISBN 978-0-252-03813-6.
- Helicon (2018). "The Hutchinson Unabridged Encyclopedia with Atlas and Weather Guide". Censorship, Film.
- Ooten, Melissa (March 2013). "Censorship In Black And White: The Burning Cross (1947), Band Of Angels (1957) And The Politics Of Film Censorship In The American South After World War II". Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television. 33 (1): 77–98. doi:10.1080/01439685.2013.764719.
- Sova, Dawn (2001). Forbidden films: censorship histories of 125 motion pictures. New York: Facts on File. pp. xv, 368. ISBN 0816043361.
- Forbidden Films: Censorship Histories of 125 Motion Pictures by Dawn Sova ISBN 0-8160-4336-1
- Behind The Mask of Innocence: Sex, Violence, Crime: Films of Social Conscience in the Silent Era by Kevin Brownlow, 2nd ed. (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992). Contains considerable information about film censorship in pre-1930 America, and discusses banned silent films in great detail.
- "Better Left Unsaid: Victorian Novels, Hays Code Films, and the Benefits of Censorship" by Nora Gilbert. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013) ISBN 978-0804784207
- Freedom of the Screen: Legal Challenges to Movie Censorship by Laura Wittern-Keller (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2008).
- Silencing Cinema: Film Censorship Around the World edited by Daniel Biltereyst and Roel Vande Winkel, Palgrave/Macmillan, 2013.
- Vicente, A. (2018, diciembre 16). 50 años de cine X y de lucha contra la censura [50 years of X movies and fight against censorship]. El País, p. 30, Cultura (Retrieved December 16, 2018)