Hox genes, a subset of homeobox genes, are a group of related genes that specify regions of the body plan of an embryo along the head-tail axis of animals. Hox proteins encode and specify the characteristics of 'position', ensuring that the correct structures form in the correct places of the body. For example, Hox genes in insects specify which appendages form on a segment (e.g. legs, antennae, and wings in fruit flies), and Hox genes in vertebrates specify the types and shape of vertebrae that will form. In segmented animals, Hox proteins thus confer segmental or positional identity, but do not form the actual segments themselves.
An analogy for the Hox genes can be made to the role of a play director that calls which scene the actors should carry out next. If the play director calls the scenes in the wrong order, the overall play will be presented in the wrong order. Similarly, mutations in the Hox genes can result in body parts and limbs in the wrong place along the body. Like a play director, the Hox genes do not act in the play or participate in limb formation themselves.
The protein product of each Hox gene is a transcription factor. Each Hox gene contains a well-conserved DNA sequence known as the homeobox, of which the term "Hox" was originally a contraction. However, in current usage the term Hox is no longer equivalent to homeobox, because Hox genes are not the only genes to possess a homeobox sequence: humans have over 200 homeobox genes of which 39 are Hox genes . Hox genes are thus a subset of the homeobox transcription factor genes. In many animals, the organization of the Hox genes in the chromosome is the same as the order of their expression along the anterior-posterior axis of the developing animal, and are thus said to display colinearity.
- 1 Biochemical Function
- 2 Conservation
- 3 In Drosophila
- 4 Classification of Hox proteins
- 5 Genes regulated by Hox proteins
- 6 Enhancer sequences bound by homeodomains
- 7 Regulation of Hox genes
- 8 Collinearity
- 9 Nomenclature
- 10 In other species
- 11 History
- 12 Future
- 13 See also
- 14 References
- 15 Further reading
- 16 External links
The products of Hox genes are Hox proteins. Hox proteins are a subset of transcription factors, which are proteins that are capable of binding to specific nucleotide sequences on DNA called enhancers through which they either activate or repress hundreds of other genes. The same Hox protein can act as a repressor at one gene and an activator at another. The ability of Hox proteins to bind DNA is conferred by a part of the protein referred to as the homeodomain. The homeodomain is a 60-amino-acid-long DNA-binding domain (encoded by its corresponding 180-base-pair DNA sequence, the homeobox). This amino acid sequence folds into a "helix-turn-helix" (i.e. homeodomain fold) motif that is stabilized by a third helix. The consensus polypeptide chain is shown below:. Hox proteins often act in partnership with co-factors, such as PBC and Meis proteins encoded by very different types of homeobox gene .
Helix 1 Helix 2 Helix 3/4 ______________ __________ _________________ RRRKRTAYTRYQLLELEKEFLFNRYLTRRRRIELAHSLNLTERHIKIWFQNRRMKWKKEN ....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....| 10 20 30 40 50 60
Homeobox genes, and thus the homeodomain protein motif, are found in most eukaryotes. Hox genes, being a subset of homeobox genes, arose more recently in evolution within the animal kingdom or Metazoa. Within the animal kingdom, Hox genes are present across the bilateria  (animals with a clear head-to-tail axis), and have also been found in Cnidaria such as sea anemones . This implies that Hox genes arose over 550 million years ago. In bilateria, Hox genes are often arranged in gene clusters, although there are many exceptions where the genes have been separated by chromosomal rearrangements . Comparing homeodomain sequences between Hox proteins often reveals greater similarity between species than within a species; this observation led to the conclusion that Hox gene clusters evolved early in animal evolution from a single Hox gene via tandem duplication and subsequent divergence, and that a prototypic Hox gene cluster containing at least seven different Hox genes was present in the common ancestor of all bilaterian animals.
In most bilaterian animals, Hox genes are expressed in staggered domains along the head-to-tail axis of the embryo, suggesting that their role in specifying position is a shared, ancient feature . The functional conservation of Hox proteins can be demonstrated by the fact that a fly can function to a large degree with a chicken Hox protein in place of its own. So, despite having a last common ancestor that lived over 550 million years ago, the chicken and fly version of the same Hox gene are similar enough to target the same downstream genes in flies.
Drosophila melanogaster is an important model for understanding body plan generation and evolution. The general principles of Hox gene function and logic elucidated in flies will apply to all bilaterian organisms, including humans. Drosophila, like all insects, has eight Hox genes. These are clustered into two complexes, both of which are located on chromosome 3. The Antennapedia complex (not to be confused with the Antp gene) consists of five genes: labial (lab), proboscipedia (pb), deformed (Dfd), sex combs reduced (Scr), and Antennapedia (Antp). The Bithorax complex, named after the Ultrabithorax gene, consists of the remaining three genes: Ultrabithorax (Ubx), abdominal-A (abd-A) and abdominal-B (abd-B).
The lab gene is the most anteriorly expressed gene. It is expressed in the head, primarily in the intercalary segment (an appendageless segment between the antenna and mandible), and also in the midgut. Loss of function of lab results in the failure of the Drosophila embryo to internalize the mouth and head structures that initially develop on the outside of its body (a process called head involution). Failure of head involution disrupts or deletes the salivary glands and pharynx. The lab gene was initially so named because it disrupted the labial appendage; however, the lab gene is not expressed in the labial segment, and the labial appendage phenotype is likely a result of the broad disorganization resulting from the failure of head involution.
The Dfd gene is responsible for the formation of the maxillary and mandibular segments in the larval head. The mutant phenotypes of Dfd are similar to those of labial. Loss of function of Dfd in the embryo results in a failure of head involution (see labial gene), with a loss of larval head structures. Mutations in the adult have either deletions of parts of the head or transformations of head to thoracic identity.
Sex combs reduced
The Scr gene is responsible for cephalic and thoracic development in Drosophila embryo and adult.
The second thoracic segment, or T2, develops a pair of legs and a pair of wings. The Antp gene specifies this identity by promoting leg formation and allowing (but not directly activating) wing formation. A dominant Antp mutation, caused by a chromosomal inversion, causes Antp to be expressed in the antennal imaginal disc, so that, instead of forming an antenna, the disc makes a leg, resulting in a leg coming out of the fly's head.
The third thoracic segment, or T3, bears a pair of legs and a pair of halteres (highly reduced wings that function in balancing during flight). Ubx patterns T3 largely by repressing genes involved in wing formation. The wing blade is composed of two layers of cells that adhere tightly to one another, and are supplied with nutrient by several wing veins. One of the many genes that Ubx represses is blistered, which activates proteins involved in cell-cell adhesion, and spalt, which patterns the placement of wing veins. In Ubx loss-of-function mutants, Ubx no longer represses wing genes, and the halteres develop as a second pair of wings, resulting in the famous four-winged flies. When Ubx is misexpressed in the second thoracic segment, such as occurs in flies with the "Cbx" enhancer mutation, it represses wing genes, and the wings develop as halteres, resulting in a four-haltered fly.
In Drosophila, abd-A is expressed along most of the abdomen, from abdominal segments 1 (A1) to A8. Expression of abd-A is necessary to specify the identity of most of the abdominal segments. A major function of abd-A in insects is to repress limb formation. In abd-A loss-of-function mutants, abdominal segments A2 through A8 are transformed into an identity more like A1. When abd-A is ectopically expressed throughout the embryo, all segments anterior of A4 are transformed to an A4-like abdominal identity. The abd-A gene also affects the pattern of cuticle generation in the ectoderm, and pattern of muscle generation in the mesoderm.
Gene abd-B is transcribed in two different forms, a regulatory protein, and a morphogenic protein. Regulatory abd-B suppress embryonic ventral epidermal structures in the eighth and ninth segments of the Drosophila abdomen. Both the regulatory protein and the morphogenic protein are involved in the development of the tail segment.
Classification of Hox proteins
Proteins with a high degree of sequence similarity are also generally assumed to exhibit a high degree of functional similarity, i.e. Hox proteins with identical homeodomains are assumed to have identical DNA-binding properties (unless additional sequences are known to influence DNA-binding). To identify the set of proteins between two different species that are most likely to be most similar in function, classification schemes are used. For Hox proteins, three different classification schemes exist: phylogenetic inference based, synteny-based, and sequence similarity-based. The three classification schemes provide conflicting information for Hox proteins expressed in the middle of the body axis (Hox6-8 and Antp, Ubx and abd-A). A combined approach used phylogenetic inference-based information of the different species and plotted the protein sequence types onto the phylogenetic tree of the species. The approach identified the proteins that best represent ancestral forms (Hox7 and Antp) and the proteins that represent new, derived versions (or were lost in an ancestor and are now missing in numerous species).
Genes regulated by Hox proteins
Hox genes act at many levels within developmental gene hierarchies: at the "executive" level they regulate genes that in turn regulate large networks of other genes (like the gene pathway that forms an appendage). They also directly regulate what are called realisator genes or effector genes that act at the bottom of such hierarchies to ultimately form the tissues, structures, and organs of each segment. Segmentation involves such processes as morphogenesis (differentiation of precursor cells into their terminal specialized cells), the tight association of groups of cells with similar fates, the sculpting of structures and segment boundaries via programmed cell death, and the movement of cells from where they are first born to where they will ultimately function, so it is not surprising that the target genes of Hox genes promote cell division, cell adhesion, apoptosis, and cell migration.
|Organism||Target gene||Normal function of target gene||Regulated by|
|Drosophila||distal-less||activates gene pathway for limb formation||ULTRABITHORAX
|distal-less||activates gene pathway for limb formation||ABDOMINAL-A
|decapentaplegic||triggers cell shape changes in the gut that are
required for normal visceral morphology
|reaper||Apoptosis: localized cell death creates the segmental
boundary between the maxilla and mandible of the head
|decapentaplegic||prevents the above cell changes in more posterior
|Mouse||EphA7||Cell adhesion: causes tight association of cells in
distal limb that will form digit, carpal and tarsal bones
|Cdkn1a||Cell cycle: differentiation of myelomonocyte cells into
monocytes (white blood cells), with cell cycle arrest
Enhancer sequences bound by homeodomains
The DNA sequence bound by the homeodomain protein contains the nucleotide sequence TAAT, with the 5' terminal T being the most important for binding. This sequence is conserved in nearly all sites recognized by homeodomains, and probably distinguishes such locations as DNA binding sites. The base pairs following this initial sequence are used to distinguish between homeodomain proteins, all of which have similar recognition sites. For instance, the nucleotide following the TAAT sequence is recognized by the amino acid at position 9 of the homeodomain protein. In the maternal protein Bicoid, this position is occupied by lysine, which recognizes and binds to the nucleotide guanine. In Antennapedia, this position is occupied by glutamine, which recognizes and binds to adenine. If the lysine in Bicoid is replaced by glutamine, the resulting protein will recognize Antennapedia-binding enhancer sites.
However, all homeodomain-containing transcription factors bind essentially the same DNA sequence. The sequence bound by the homeodomain of a Hox protein is only six nucleotides long, and such a short sequence would be found at random many times throughout the genome, far more than the number of actual functional sites. Especially for Hox proteins, which produce such dramatic changes in morphology when misexpressed, this raises the question of how each transcription factor can produce such specific and different outcomes if they all bind the same sequence. One mechanism that introduces greater DNA sequence specificity to Hox proteins is to bind protein cofactors. Two such Hox cofactors are Extradenticle (Exd) and Homothorax (Hth). Exd and Hth bind to Hox proteins and appear to induce conformational changes in the Hox protein that increase its specificity.
Regulation of Hox genes
Just as Hox genes regulate realisator genes, they are in turn regulated themselves by other genes. In Drosophila and some insects (but not most animals), Hox genes are regulated by gap genes and pair-rule genes, which are in their turn regulated by maternally-supplied mRNA. This results in a transcription factor cascade: maternal factors activate gap or pair-rule genes; gap and pair-rule genes activate Hox genes; then, finally, Hox genes activate realisator genes that cause the segments in the developing embryo to differentiate. Regulation is achieved via protein concentration gradients, called morphogenic fields. For example, high concentrations of one maternal protein and low concentrations of others will turn on a specific set of gap or pair-rule genes. In flies, stripe 2 in the embryo is activated by the maternal proteins Bicoid and Hunchback, but repressed by the gap proteins Giant and Kruppel. Thus, stripe 2 will only form wherever there is Bicoid and Hunchback, but not where there is Giant and Kruppel.
Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) has been shown to be abundant in Hox clusters. In humans, 231 ncRNA may be present. One of these, HOTAIR, silences in trans (it is transcribed from the HOXC cluster and inhibits late HOXD genes) by binding to Polycomb-group proteins (PRC2).
In higher animals including humans, retinoic acid regulates differential expression of Hox genes along the anteroposterior axis. Genes in the 3' ends of Hox clusters are induced by retinoic acid resulting in expression domains that extend more anteriorly in the body compared to 5' Hox genes that are not induced by retinoic acid resulting in expression domains that remain more posterior.
Quantitative PCR has shown several trends regarding colinearity: the system is in equilibrium and the total number of transcripts depends on the number of genes present according to a linear relationship.
In some organisms, especially vertebrates, the various Hox genes are situated very close to one another on the chromosome in groups or clusters. The order of the genes on the chromosome is the same as the expression of the genes in the developing embryo, with the first gene being expressed in the anterior end of the developing organism. The reason for this colinearity is not yet completely understood, but could be related to the activation of Hox genes in a temporal sequence by gradual unpacking of chromatin along a gene cluster. The diagram above shows the relationship between the genes and protein expression in flies.
The Hox genes are named for the homeotic phenotypes that result when their function is disrupted, wherein one segment develops with the identity of another (e.g. legs where antennae should be). Hox genes in different phyla have been given different names, which has led to confusion about nomenclature. The complement of Hox genes in Drosophila is made up of two clusters, the Antennapedia complex and the Bithorax complex, which together were historically referred to as the HOM-C (for Homeotic Complex). Although historically HOM-C genes have referred to Drosophila homologues, while Hox genes referred to vertebrate homologues, this distinction is no longer made, and both HOM-C and Hox genes are called Hox genes.
In other species
|HOXA@||chromosome 7||HOXA1, HOXA2, HOXA3, HOXA4, HOXA5, HOXA6, HOXA7, HOXA9, HOXA10, HOXA11, HOXA13|
|HOXB@||chromosome 17||HOXB1, HOXB2, HOXB3, HOXB4, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7, HOXB8, HOXB9, HOXB13|
|HOXC@||chromosome 12||HOXC4, HOXC5, HOXC6, HOXC8, HOXC9, HOXC10, HOXC11, HOXC12, HOXC13|
|HOXD@||chromosome 2||HOXD1, HOXD3, HOXD4, HOXD8, HOXD9, HOXD10, HOXD11, HOXD12, HOXD13|
The ancestors of vertebrates had a single Hox gene cluster  , which was duplicated (twice) early in vertebrate evolution by whole genome duplications to give four Hox gene clusters: Hoxa, Hoxb, Hoxc and Hoxd. It is currently unclear whether these duplications occurred before or after divergence of lampreys and hagfish from the rest of vertebrates . Most mammals, amphibians, reptiles and birds have four HOX clusters, while most teleost fish, including zebrafish and medaka, have seven or eight Hox gene clusters because of an additional genome duplication which occurred in their evolutionary history . In zebrafish, one of the eight Hox gene clusters (a Hoxd cluster) has lost all protein-coding genes, and just a single microRNA gene marks the location of the original cluster.. In some teleost fish, such as salmon, an even more recent genome duplication occurred, doubling the seven or eight Hox gene clusters to give at least 13 clusters 
Hox genes, especially those of the HoxA and HoxD clusters, are implicated in the limb regeneration abilities of Amphibians and Reptiles. In addition, one of the bat accelerated regions (analogous to human accelerated regions) called BAR116 is an enhancer that defines a unique expression pattern of HoxD genes in the fore and hind limbs, possibly playing a role in the evolution of wings.
Six Hox genes are dispersed in the genome of Caenorhabditis elegans, a roundworm.(fig. 3) Hydra and Nematostella vectensis, both in the Phylum Cnidaria, have a few Hox/ParaHox-like homeobox genes. Hox gene expression has also been studied in brachiopods, annelids,  and a suite of molluscs.
The Hox genes are so named because mutations in them cause homeotic transformations. Homeotic transformations were first identified and studied by William Bateson in 1894, who coined the term "homeosis". After the rediscovery of Mendel's genetic principles, Bateson and others realized that some examples of homeosis in floral organs and animal skeletons could be attributed to variation in genes.
Definitive evidence for a genetic basis of some homeotic transformations was obtained by isolating homeotic mutants. The first homeotic mutant was found by Calvin Bridges in Thomas Hunt Morgan's laboratory in 1915. This mutant shows a partial duplication of the thorax and was therefore named Bithorax (bx). It transforms the third thoracic segment (T3) toward the second (T2). Bithorax arose spontaneously in the laboratory and has been maintained continuously as a laboratory stock ever since.
The genetic studies by Morgan and others provided the foundation for the systematic analyses of Edward B. Lewis and Thomas Kaufman, which provided preliminary definitions of the many homeotic genes of the Bithorax and Antennapedia complexes, and also showed that the mutant phenotypes for most of these genes could be traced back to patterning defects in the embryonic body plan.
Ed Lewis, Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard and Eric F. Wieschaus identified and classified 15 genes of key importance in determining the body plan and the formation of body segments of the fruit fly D. melanogaster in 1980. For their work, Lewis, Nüsslein-Volhard, and Wieschaus were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1995.
In 1983, the homeobox was discovered independently by researchers in two labs: Ernst Hafen, Michael Levine, and William McGinnis (in Walter Gehring's lab at the University of Basel, Switzerland) and Matthew P. Scott and Amy Weiner (in Thomas Kaufman's lab at Indiana University in Bloomington).
Hox genes play critical roles in the development of structures such as limbs, lungs, the nervous system, and eyes. As T. R. Lappin and colleagues observed in 2006, "Evolutionary conservation provides unlimited scope for experimental investigation of the functional control of the Hox gene network which is providing important insights into human disease." In the future, more research can be done in investigating the roles of Hox genes in Leukaemia and cancer (such as EOC).
- Homeotic gene
- Hox genes in amphibians and reptiles
- Discredited hypotheses for the Cambrian explosion (Section: Regulatory genes)
- Holland PWH, Booth HAB, Bruford EA (2007) Classification of all human homeobox genes. BMC Biology 5:47 https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-5-47
- Burglin TR, Affolter M (2016) Homeodomain proteins: an update. Chromosoma 125:497-521.doi: 10.1007/s00412-015-0543-8
- Pearson, Joseph C.; Lemons, Derek; McGinnis, William (2005). "Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning". Nature Reviews Genetics. 6 (12): 893–904. doi:10.1038/nrg1726. PMID 16341070.
- Carroll S. B. (1995). "Homeotic genes and the evolution of arthropods and chordates". Nature. 376 (6540): 479–85. Bibcode:1995Natur.376..479C. doi:10.1038/376479a0. PMID 7637779.
- Merabet S, Galliot B (2015) The TALE face of Hox proteins in animal evolution. Frontiers in Genetics 6:267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00267
- de Rosa et al. (1999) Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution. Nature: 399: 772–776
- Ryan JF et al. (2007) Pre-Bilaterian Origins of the Hox Cluster and the Hox Code: Evidence from the Sea Anemone, Nematostella vectensis. PLoS ONE 2(1): e153 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000153
- Ferrier DEK, Minguillon C (2003) Evolution of the Hox/ParaHox gene clusters. Int J Dev Biol. 47:605-611
- McGinnis W, Krumlauf R (1992) Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68: 283-302 doi https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90290-9
- Gaunt SJ (2018) Hox cluster genes and collinearities throughout the tree of animal life. Int J Dev Biol. 62:673-683 doi: 10.1387/ijdb.180162sg
- Lutz, B.; H.C. Lu; G. Eichele; D. Miller; T.C. Kaufman (1996). "Rescue of Drosophila labial null mutant by the chicken ortholog Hoxb-1 demonstrates that the function of Hox genes is phylogenetically conserved". Genes & Development. 10 (2): 176–184. doi:10.1101/gad.10.2.176. PMID 8566751.
- Ayala, F.J.; A. Rzhetskydagger (20 January 1998). "Origin of the metazoan phyla: Molecular clocks confirm paleontological estimates". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95 (2): 606–11. Bibcode:1998PNAS...95..606J. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.2.606. PMC 18467. PMID 9435239.
- Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan. Hughes CL, Kaufman TC. Evol Dev. 2002 Nov-Dec;4(6):459-99.
- Brody, Thomas (1996). "The Interactive Fly".
- Regulski M, McGinnis N, Chadwick R, McGinnis W (March 1987). "Developmental and molecular analysis of Deformed; a homeotic gene controlling Drosophila head development". EMBO J. 6 (3): 767–77. doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04819.x. PMC 553462. PMID 16453752.
- Pattatucci AM, Kaufman TC (October 1991). "The homeotic gene Sex combs reduced of Drosophila melanogaster is differentially regulated in the embryonic and imaginal stages of development". Genetics. 129 (2): 443–61. PMC 1204635. PMID 1683847.
- Hueber S.D.; Weiller, G.F.; Djordjevic, M. A.; Frickey, T. (2010). "Improving Hox Protein Classification across the Major Model Organisms". PLOS ONE. 5 (5): e10820. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...510820H. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010820. PMC 2876039. PMID 20520839.
- Hueber S.D.; Rauch J.; Djordjevic M.A.; Gunter H.; Weiller G.F.; Frickey T. (2013). "Analysis of central Hox protein types across bilaterian clades: On the diversification of central Hox proteins from an Antennapedia/Hox7-like protein". Developmental Biology. 383 (2): 175–185. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.09.009. PMID 24055174.
- Pearson, JC; Lemons, D.; McGinnis, W. (2005). "Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning". Nature Reviews Genetics. 6 (12): 893–904. doi:10.1038/nrg1726. PMID 16341070.
- Vachon, G.; et al. (1992). "Homeotic genes of the bithorax complex repress limb development in the abdomen of the Drosophila embryo through the target gene Distal-less". Cell. 71 (3): 437–450. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90513-C. PMID 1358457.
- Capovilla, M.; Botas, J. (1998). "Functional dominance among Hox genes: repression dominates activation in the regulation of dpp". Development. 125: 4949–4957.
- Lohmann, I.; McGinnis, N.; Bodmer, M.; McGinnis, W. (2002). "The Drosophila Hox gene Deformed sculpts head morphology via direct regulation of the apoptosis activator reaper". Cell. 110 (4): 457–466. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00871-1. PMID 12202035.
- Bromleigh, V. C.; Freedman, L. P. (2000). "p21 is a transcriptional target of HOXA10 in differentiating myelomonocytic cells". Genes Dev. 14 (20): 2581–2586. doi:10.1101/gad.817100. PMC 317001. PMID 11040212.
- Gilbert, Developmental Biology, 2006
- Hanes and Brent 1989, 1991
- Mann, Richard S.; Lelli, Katherine M.; Joshi, Rohit (2009). Chapter 3 Hox Specificity: Unique Roles for Cofactors and Collaborators. Current Topics in Developmental Biology. 88. pp. 63–101. doi:10.1016/S0070-2153(09)88003-4. ISBN 9780123745293. PMC 2810641. PMID 19651302.
- Small, S; Blair, A; Levine, M (Nov 1992). "Regulation of even-skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo". EMBO J. 11 (11): 4047–57. doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05498.x. PMC 556915. PMID 1327756.
- Lempradl, A; Ringrose, L (2008). "How does noncoding transcription regulate Hox genes?". BioEssays. 30 (2): 110–21. doi:10.1002/bies.20704. PMID 18200528.
- Rinn, JL; Kertesz, M; Wang, JK; Squazzo, SL; Xu, X; Brugmann, SA; Goodnough, LH; Helms, JA; et al. (2007). "Functional Demarcation of Active and Silent Chromatin Domains in Human HOX Loci by Non-Coding RNAs". Cell. 129 (7): 1311–23. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.022. PMC 2084369. PMID 17604720.
- Fraser, P; Bickmore, W. (2007). "Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation". Nature. 447 (7143): 413–7. Bibcode:2007Natur.447..413F. doi:10.1038/nature05916. PMID 17522674.
- Duester, G (September 2008). "Retinoic Acid Synthesis and Signaling during Early Organogenesis". Cell. 134 (6): 921–31. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.002. PMC 2632951. PMID 18805086.
- Montavon; Le Garrec, JF; Kerszberg, M; Duboule, D (2008). "Modeling Hox gene regulation in digits: reverse collinearity and the molecular origin of thumbness". Genes Dev. 22 (3): 346–59. doi:10.1101/gad.1631708. PMC 2216694. PMID 18245448.
- Lappin, TR; Grier, DG; Thompson, A; Halliday, HL (January 2006). "HOX genes: seductive science, mysterious mechanisms". The Ulster Medical Journal. 75 (1): 23–31. PMC 1891803. PMID 16457401.
- Scott, Matthew P. (13 November 1992). "Vertebrate homeobox gene nomenclature". Cell. 71 (4): 551–553. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90588-4. ISSN 0092-8674. PMID 1358459.
- Garcia-Fernandez J, Holland PWH (1994) Archetypal organisation of the amphioxus Hox gene cluster. Nature 370:563-6.
- Spagnuolo, A., Ristoratore, F., Di Gregorio, A., Aniello, F., Branno, M. & Di Lauro, R. (2003) Gene 309 , 71–79
- Holland, LZ, Ocampo Daza D (2018) A new look at an old question: when did the second whole genome duplication occur in vertebrate evolution? Genome Biology. 19:209 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1592-0
- Hoegg, S., Boore, J. L., Kuehl, J. V., & Meyer, A. (2007). Comparative phylogenomic analyses of teleost fish Hox gene clusters: lessons from the cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni. BMC genomics, 8(1), 317.
- Woltering, Joost M; Durston, Antony J (1 June 2006). "The zebrafish hoxDb cluster has been reduced to a single microRNA". Nature Genetics. 38 (6): 601–602. doi:10.1038/ng0606-601. PMID 16736008.
- Mungpakdee S, Seo HC, Angotzi AR, Dong X, Akalin A, Chourrout D. Differential evolution of the 13 Atlantic salmon Hox clusters. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1333–43.
- Mullen, L. M., Bryant, S. V., Torok, M. A., Blumberg, B., & Gardiner, D. M. (1996). "Nerve dependency of regeneration: the role of Distal-less and FGF signaling in amphibian limb regeneration." Development (Cambridge, England), 122(11), 3487–3497.
- Booker, BM; Friedrich, T; Mason, MK; VanderMeer, JE; Zhao, J; Eckalbar, WL; Logan, M; Illing, N; Pollard, KS; Ahituv, N (March 2016). "Bat Accelerated Regions Identify a Bat Forelimb Specific Enhancer in the HoxD Locus". PLoS Genetics. 12 (3): e1005738. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005738. PMC 4809552. PMID 27019019.
- Holland LZ et al. (2008) The amphioxus genome illuminates vertebrate origins and cephalochordate biology. Genome Research 18: 1100–1111. doi: 10.1101/gr.073676.107
- de Rosa, Renaud; Grenier, Jennifer K.; Andreeva, Tatiana; Cook, Charles E.; Adoutte, André; Akam, Michael; Carroll, Sean B.; Balavoine, Guillaume (24 June 1999). "Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution". Nature. 399 (6738): 772–776. Bibcode:1999Natur.399..772D. doi:10.1038/21631. PMID 10391241.
- Gauchat, D; Mazet, F; Berney, C; Schummer, M; Kreger, S; Pawlowski, J; Galliot, B (25 April 2000). "Evolution of Antp-class genes and differential expression of Hydra Hox/paraHox genes in anterior patterning". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 97 (9): 4493–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.9.4493. PMC 18262. PMID 10781050.
- Ryan, JF; Mazza, ME; Pang, K; Matus, DQ; Baxevanis, AD; Martindale, MQ; Finnerty, JR (24 January 2007). "Pre-bilaterian origins of the Hox cluster and the Hox code: evidence from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis". PLOS ONE. 2 (1): e153. Bibcode:2007PLoSO...2..153R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000153. PMC 1779807. PMID 17252055.
- Gasiorowski, Ludwik; Hejnol, Andreas (2018). "Hox gene expression in postmetamorphic juveniles of the brachiopod Terebratalia transversa". bioRxiv: 449488. doi:10.1101/449488.
- Kulakova, Milana; Bakalenko, Nadezhda; Novikova, Elena; Cook, Charles E.; Eliseeva, Elena; Steinmetz, Patrick R. H.; Kostyuchenko, Roman P.; Dondua, Archil; Arendt, Detlev; Akam, Michael; Andreeva, Tatiana (2007). "Hox gene expression in larval development of the polychaetes Nereis virens and Platynereis dumerilii (Annelida, Lophotrochozoa)". Development Genes and Evolution. 217 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1007/s00427-006-0119-y. PMID 17180685.
- e.g. Lee, Patricia N.; Callaerts, Patrick; De Couet, Heinz G.; Martindale, Mark Q. (2003). "Cephalopod Hox genes and the origin of morphological novelties". Nature. 424 (6952): 1061–1065. Bibcode:2003Natur.424.1061L. doi:10.1038/nature01872. PMID 12944969.
- Gehring, Walter J. (1998). Master Control Genes in Development and Evolution: The Homeobox Story. Yale Univ. Press.
- Nüsslein-Volhard, Christiane; Wieschaus, Eric (30 October 1980). "Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila" (PDF). Nature. 287 (5785): 795–801. Bibcode:1980Natur.287..795N. doi:10.1038/287795a0. PMID 6776413.
- "The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1995". Nobelprize.org.
- Lappin, T. R., Grier, D. G., Thompson, A., & Halliday, H. L. (2006). HOX genes: seductive science, mysterious mechanisms. The Ulster medical journal, 75(1), 23-31.
- Hunt, Paul (1998). "The Function of Hox Genes". In Bittar, E. Edward (ed.). Developmental biology. Elsevier. ISBN 978-1-55938-816-0.