# Linear relation

In linear algebra, a **linear relation**, or simply **relation**, between elements of a vector space or a module is a linear equation that has these elements as a solution.

More precisely, if are elements of a (left) module M over a ring R (the case of a vector space over a field is a special case), a relation between is a sequence of elements of R such that

The relations between form a module. One is generally interested to the case where is a generating set of a finitely generated module M, in which case the module of the relations is often called a **syzygy module** of M. The syzygy module depends on the choice of a generating set, but it is unique up to the direct sum with a free module. That is, if and are syzygy modules corresponding to two generating sets of the same module, then there are stably isomorphic, which means that there exist two free modules and such that and are isomorphic.

Higher order syzygy modules are defined recursively: a first syzygy module of a module M is simply its syzygy module. For *k* > 1, a kth syzygy module of M is a syzygy module of a (*k* – 1)-th syzygy module. Hilbert's syzygy theorem states that, if is a polynomial ring in n indeterminates over a field, then every nth syzygy module is free. The case *n* = 0 is the fact that every finite dimensional vector space has a basis, and the case *n* = 1 is the fact that *K*[*x*] is a principal ideal domain and that every submodule of a finitely generated free *K*[*x*] module is also free.

The construction of higher order syzygy modules is generalized as the definition of free resolutions, which allows restating Hilbert's syzygy theorem as *a polynomial ring in n indeterminates over a field has global homological dimension n.*

If a and b are two elements of the commutative ring R, then (*b*, –*a*) is a relation that is said *trivial*. The *module of trivial relations* of an ideal is the submodule of the first syzygy module of the ideal that is generated by the trivial relations between the elements of a generating set of an ideal. The concept of trivial relations can be generalized to higher order syzygy modules, and the leads to the concept of the Koszul complex of an ideal, which provides information on the non-trivial relations between the generators of an ideal.

## Basic definitions[edit]

Let R be a ring, and M be a left R-module. A * linear relation*, or simply a *relation* between k elements of M is a sequence of elements of M such that

If is a generating set of M, a relation is often called a *syzygy* of M. This terminology makes sense, since, although the syzygy module depend on the chosen generating set, most of its properties are independent; see § Stable properties, below.

If the ring R is Noetherian, or, at least coherent, and if M is finitely generated, then the syzygy module is also finitely generated. A syzygy module of this syzygy module is a *second syzygy module* of M. Continuing this way one can define a kth syzygy module for every positive integer k.

Hilbert's syzygy theorem asserts that, if M is a finitely generated module over a polynomial ring over a field, then any nth syzygy module is a free module.

## Stable properties[edit]

Generally speaking, in the language of K-theory, a property is *stable* if it becomes true by making a direct sum with a sufficiently large free module. A fundamental property of syzygies modules is that there are "stably independent" on choices of generating sets for involved modules. The following result is the basis of these stable properties.

**Proposition** — Let be a generating set of an R-module M, and be other elements of M. The module of the relations between is the direct sum of the module of the relations between and a free module of rank n.

*Proof.* As is a generating set, each can be written
This provides a relation between Now, if is any relation, then
is a relation between the only. In other words, every relation between is a sum of a relation between and a linear combination of the s. It is straightforward to prove that this decomposition is unique, and this proves the result.

This prove that the first syzygy module is "stably unique". More precisely, given two generating sets and of a module M, if and are the corresponding modules of relations, then there exist two free modules and such that and are isomorphic. For proving this, it suffices to apply twice the precedin proposition for getting two decompositions of the module of the relations between the union of the two generating sets.

For obtaining a similar result for higher syzygy modules, it remains to prove that, if M is any module, and L is a free module, then M and *M* ⊕ *L* have isomorphic syzygy modules. It suffices to consider a generating set of *M* ⊕ *L* that consists of a generating set of M and a basis of L. For every relation between the elements of this generating set, the coefficients of the basis elements of L are all zero, and the syzygies of *M* ⊕ *L* are exactly the syzygies of M extended with zero coefficients. This completes the proof to the following theorem.

**Theorem** — For every positive integer k, the kth syzygy module of a given module depends on choices of generating sets, but is unique up to the direct sum with a free module. More precisely, if and are kth syzygy modules that are obtained by different choices of generating sets, then there are free modules and such that and are isomorphic.

## Relationship with free resolutions[edit]

Given a generating set of an R-module, one can consider a free module of L of basis where are new indeterminates. This defines an exact sequence

where the left arrow is the linear map that maps each to the corresponding The kernel of this left arrow is a first syzygy module of M.

One can repeate this construction with this kernel in place of M. Repeating again and again this construction, one gets a long exact sequence

where all are free modules. By definition, such a long exact sequence is a free resolution of M.

For every *k* ≥ 1, the kernel of the arrow starting from is a kth syzygy module of M. It follows that the study of free resolutions is the same as the study of syzygy modules.

A free resolution is *finite* of length ≤ *n* if is free. In this case, one can take and (the zero module) for every *k* > *n*.

This allows restating Hilbert's syzygy theorem: If is a polynomial ring in n indeterminates over a field K, then every free resolution is finite of length at most n.

The global dimension of a commutative Noetherian ring is either infinite, or the minimal n such that every free resolution is finite of length at most n. A commutative Noetherian ring is regular if its global dimension is finite. In this case, the global dimension equals its Krull dimension. So, Hilbert's syzygy theorem may be restated in a very short sentence that hides much mathematics: *A polynomial ring over a field is a regular ring.*

## Trivial relations[edit]

In a commutative ring R, one has always *ab*– *ba* = 0. This implies *trivially* that (*b*, –*a*) is a linear relation between a and b. Therefore, given a generating set of an ideal I, one calls **trivial relation** or **trivial syzygy** every element of the submodule the syzygy module that is generated by these tivial relations between two generating elements. More precisely, the module of trivial syzygies is generated by the relations

such that and otherwise.

## History[edit]

The word *syzygy* came into mathematics with the work of Arthur Cayley.^{[1]} In that paper, Cayley used it for in the theory of resultants and discriminants.^{[2]}
As the word syzygy was used in astronomy to denote a linear relation between planets, Cayley used it to denote linear relations between minors of a matrix, such as, in the case of a 2×3 matrix:

Then, the word *syzygy* was popularized (among mathematicians) by David Hilbert in his 1890 article, which contains three fundamental theorems on polynomials, Hilbert's syzygy theorem, Hilbert's basis theorem and Hilbert's Nullstellensatz.

In his article, Cayley makes use, in a special case, of what was later ^{[3]} called the Koszul complex, after a similar construction in differential geometry by the mathematician Jean-Louis Koszul.

## Notes[edit]

**^**1847[Cayley 1847] A. Cayley, “On the theory of involution in geometry”, Cambridge Math. J. 11 (1847), 52–61. See also Collected Papers, Vol. 1 (1889), 80–94, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.**^**[Gel’fand et al. 1994] I. M. Gel’fand, M. M. Kapranov, and A. V. Zelevinsky, Discriminants, resultants, and multidimensional determinants, Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1994.**^**Serre, Jean-Pierre Algèbre locale. Multiplicités. (French) Cours au Collège de France, 1957–1958, rédigé par Pierre Gabriel. Seconde édition, 1965. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 11 Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York 1965 vii+188 pp.; this is the published form of mimeographed notes from Serre's lectures at the College de France in 1958.

## References[edit]

- Cox, David; Little, John; O’Shea, Donal (2007). "Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms".
*Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics*. New York, NY: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35651-8. ISBN 978-0-387-35650-1. ISSN 0172-6056. - Cox, David; Little, John; O’Shea, Donal (2005). "Using Algebraic Geometry".
*Graduate Texts in Mathematics*. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/b138611. ISBN 0-387-20706-6. - Eisenbud, David (1995).
*Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry*. Graduate Texts in Mathematics.**150**. Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5350-1. ISBN 0-387-94268-8. - David Eisenbud, The Geometry of Syzygies, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 229, Springer, 2005.