Talk:Coffee culture
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Coffee break was copied or moved into Coffee culture with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. |
WikiProject Food and drink | (Rated C-class, Mid-importance) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WikiProject Culture | Inactive) | (||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
![]() | This subject is featured in the Outline of culture, which is incomplete and needs further development. |
Melbourne's coffee culture[edit]
Fuck off, Melbourne. Take your hand off your tool for a second and quit stroking. Yes, the coffee culture is good in Melbourne, but no more so than it is in Brisbane and Sydney. The coffee culture in Australia is excellent, this isn't a Melbourne-thing. Christ.
Untitled[edit]
wow: this article is terribad.
- testify —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.48.25.60 (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Is this an advertisement for Starbucks? -- 140.112.218.130 (talk) 08:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Improvement[edit]
Some topics from the coffee article should be listed here in the coffee culture article. Not to compare but, see the tea and tea culture articles. icetea8 (talk) 04:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
"Cafe au laiters" and "Espressonites"[edit]
People that participate in cafe culture are sometimes referred to as "cafe au laiters" and "espressonites"
This weasely sentence has been tagged as such for over two years. Anecdotally, I've never once heard either of those terms used in any way outside of that sentence in this article, and I've tended coffee bar for a good handful of years. None of the other baristas I know have encountered those terms, either. Though I understand that my anecdotal lack of evidence is not proof that these terms aren't, in fact, common enough to warrant mention, I also understand that this here is Wikipedia, and there has been no evidence presented to support their inclusion. Because it has been tagged for so long without being readdressed, I'm going to remove it. Feel free to throw it back in if you disagree with the decision and can cite valid references. ☉ nbmatt 01:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Coffee culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090520144944/http://www.stoughtonwi.com/coffee.shtml to http://www.stoughtonwi.com/coffee.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}
(last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
"Coffee break in Belgrade, Serbia" photo caption[edit]
This photo strikes me as completely pointless. The main text tells us "a coffee break ... is a routine social gathering", but the picture shows small parts of one person's body (hands and part of the torso, not even a face) and a single cup. The picture could have been taken anywhere, and tells us nothing meaningful about coffee breaks in Belgrade, or indeed anywhere else - we can't even see if the cup contains coffee, except for the word "KAFA", which is not only illegible without enlargement, but rather untypically for Serbia is written in the Latin alphabet (the Cyrillic form would be "КАФА" - however, I now see that "Grand KAFA" is a Serbian coffee manufacturer, and does seem to use the Latin alphabet, perhaps to look more cosmopolitan?). I think the definition should be changed, for I can have a coffee break without anyone else being around, and without it being routine. And if a photograph is going to be provided at all - I don't really see the need - it should surely be more informative.213.127.210.95 (talk) 15:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- C-Class Food and drink articles
- Food and drink articles with incomplete B-Class checklists
- Food and drink articles needing attention to referencing and citation
- Food and drink articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
- Food and drink articles needing attention to structure
- Food and drink articles needing attention to grammar
- Food and drink articles needing attention to supporting materials
- Food and drink articles needing attention to accessibility
- Mid-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles