Talk:Linda Sánchez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Are honorifics allowed in the infobox?[edit]

I need to look that up. . .--Morenooso (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Just got my answer from another article I follow. Please see: WP:Honorifics. It reads should and is usually followed. I will leave it up to another editor to remove this if desired. --Morenooso (talk) 06:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)--Morenooso (talk) 06:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Issue Positions[edit]

I added the issue positions topic using well-research information. All the side-issues posted are inferred by highly researched factors (such as public statements, legislation votes, etc). However, the representative refuses to officially say her issue positions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfernandezantelo (talkcontribs) 15:39, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Linda Sánchez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☑Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Linda Sánchez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Person of color[edit]

"She is the first woman of color...": I added the link to Person of color, but neither that article nor White Americans nor White Hispanic and Latino Americans settles the issue of what a POC is or which Hispanics are considered POCs, IMO. Has she publicly called herself a POC (or white)? If not, can we avoid this whole can of worms by rewording or simply omitting this sentence? Peter Chastain [¡hablá!] 06:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

OK, I just read farther down (in Works), where Publishers Weekly calls her a POC. I'm still not convinced that this binary racial classification is a useful part of our lede. Peter Chastain [¡hablá!] 06:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)