Talk:Respiratory tract

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Physiology (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the respiratory system.
 
WikiProject Anatomy (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.
 

Tract versus system[edit]

What is the difference between respiratory tract and respiratory system? --I-user (talk) 18:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

the system would be the physiology of respiration and the tract would be the anatomy of the respiratory system, the system should reference the anatomy but a separate article is necessary. Je.rrt (talk) 17:43, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Merges[edit]

Proposed merge with Upper respiratory tract[edit]

As per gastrointestinal tract, it is logical to display these three articles (Upper, Lower and Respiratory tract) on the same page. I propose this merge because:

  • It enhances the quality of the information on all three articles to have it displayed in context
  • It decreases needless fragmentation and duplication
  • The term 'respiratory tract' clearly encompasses lower and upper respiratory tract
  • Having these articles separate needlessly divides and fragments these anatomy topics LT910001 (talk) 10:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Resolved

This merge has been done. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Respiratory tree[edit]

This article could easily be integrated within 'respiratory tract' whilst providing readers a much greater amount of content, context and quality-written anatomical descriptions. "Respiratory tree" could be integrated as a single paragraph or less, and does not need its separate article LT910001 (talk) 11:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Resolved

This merge has been done. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merge with airway[edit]

The content in airway should be merged here and then airway should become a disambiguation page. There is hardly any content in airway now. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

I notice that half of foreign languages are interwiki linked with airway and the other half are with respiratory tract. Since I see no overlap, I think that is supporting evidence that other languages only have one article for this concept. That is not a rationale for merging but if there is a merge, those links need to be merged also. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
LT910001 Thoughts? I am pinging you because you have a history of merging things here. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I feel we should merge airway here, and leave it as a redirect. If we were to leave it as a disambig page I feel it would more-or-less be a reiteration of the respiratory tract article, ie "Airway may be used to refer to a component of the respiratory tract, such as...", so I feel it would be helpful to have it merge here. --LT910001 (talk) 00:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Generations[edit]

Where is the source that says human lungs contain up to 28 generations (dichotomous branching)? From what I have learned (as an anaesthetist) and looked up on the internet, 23 generations are the most commonly quoted figure. Furthermore in my opinion, quoting "up to" is not as helpful as the "average".Senaiboy (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Senaiboy for pointing this out. I have just completed a merge and restructure of the article from the above article. I feel some of the text is shoddy at best, and would be very grateful if you could run you eye over it more closely and make any changes you see fit. --LT910001 (talk) 00:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Tracheobronchial tree[edit]

This could readily be merged with 'respiratory tree' for greater readability and access. LT910001 (talk) 01:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Resolved

This merge has been done. Iztwoz (talk) 07:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Change page to Human respiratory system[edit]

Since Lung is divided into Human lung and Lung, have suggested on Respiratory system talk page, a separate page for human respiratory system which I think could be new home for Respiratory tract - there is a lot of duplicate material and think Respiratory system is more likely to be looked up than respiratory tract. Iztwoz (talk) 11:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

It may be useful to split respiratory system into general and human, though that page doesn't actually have a lot specific to humans currently, so maybe not. The respiratory tract is anatomical whereas the respiratory system includes the anatomy of the respiratory tract, other respiratory anatomy, and respiratory physiology, so believe they should definitely be separate articles. PriceDL (talk) 04:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Human lung has since been merged. I don't think this page has enough content or relevant human-related content to be split at the moment. Ping to Iztwoz given it's been 2+ years. --Tom (LT) (talk) 20:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Conducting zone[edit]

Small stub better presented on target page where already mentioned Iztwoz (talk) 20:41, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Respiratory zone[edit]

Small stub better presented on target page where already mentioned Iztwoz (talk) 20:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Respiratory tract. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 3 September 2017 (UTC)