Talk:Women in Hinduism
|This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Assigned student editor(s): Ensquared. Assigned peer reviews: Vnguyen518, Efoxman42, Annkat22, Lnicholson14.|
|This article is/was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Duquesne University/UCOR 143 Global and Cultural Perspectives (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.|
|This article is/was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Duquesne University/UCOR 143 Global and Cultural Perspectives (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.|
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Women in Hinduism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|This article is/was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Duquesne University/UCOR 143 (Spring 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.|
@Ensquared: You added the following to Hindu Education of Women section, "However, another section of the Upanishads overrides such a desire by explaining that women could not involve in Vedic studies." You also added a 1956 book by Altekar as source at the end of the paragraph, without page numbers. Please identify the page number of the source, where this statement is, for WP:Verifiability, because I have the Altekar book and it states something very different. BTW, Altekar book was first published in 1938 (1956 edition was a reprint with some updates), it is an old source, not WP:HISTRS, and it must be cross checked with more recent sources. But for now, I wait for a page number. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- I will update the page numbers later today. Thank you again for your feedback. Just as a personal reference, here is the link to the book version I have been getting the information from. I will definitely incorporate your thoughts, however. For now I have deleted the initial statement you identified as problematic, but will look into the page number and update. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=VYG4K0yYHQgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR12&dq=The+position+of+women+in+Hindu+civilization,+from+prehistoric+times+to+the+present+day&ots=HuZAlwF-jz&sig=woihOgz1Sl2O3GLt3Y_oc03aKfA#v=onepage&q=The%20position%20of%20women%20in%20Hindu%20civilization%2C%20from%20prehistoric%20times%20to%20the%20present%20day&f=false Ensquared (talk) 15:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- I am also working on adding a section on Hindu women clothing and dress, do you have any suggestions on where in the article that would be most useful and relevant? Ensquared (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Ensquared: I will wait for page numbers for the rest of the section. A dress section would be an excellent addition. You can find a good historical coverage about the diversity yet common elements of dress of women in Hindudism, across ancient, medieval and modern times, in the old but respected source GS Ghurye (1967), Indian Costumes, ISBN 978-0718922801, pages 65-100, 105-125, 150-180 respectively. A more recent source is Emma Tarlo (1996), Clothing Matters: Dress and Identity in India, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0226789767, (Chapter 2 discusses dressing history among Hindu women, which is what this article should focus on; other chapters discuss the dress as identity issue in Hindu-Muslim conflict first, later anti-colonialism). Google for 'dress, women, hinduism' literature by Bernard Cohn, Christopher Bayly. That should get you started on a good foundation. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Ensquared: Excellent. I will leave those three sections empty, in your good hands. If you need Hindu text sources for women and fine arts, see this section. Of those listed there, the three books by Baumer, Khokar and Nijenhuis would give you a good foundation, as they are fine reviews of relevant scholarship on "arts, women and Hinduism". Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 01:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Great job providing diverse and competing viewpoints on women in Hinduism! This article is very informative; it highlights the complexities of gender in Hinduism through a multidimensional job. Impressive work remaining neutral and supporting different claims. The images also help capture the diversity in thought and provide a visual representation of some of the ideas you discuss. If anything, I would suggest simply going back through the article a couple more times and maybe simplifying some of the sentences to make them a little more concise and understandable for all audiences. Good job!! Efoxman42 (talk) 02:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
I think that you have done a great job on this article! You put a lot of thought into your contributions and have successfully changed some of the bad wording and headers on your page. The few recommendations I have are that you could provide more information in your education section as well as a few more sources to support your claims. If you provide additional sources, your entire article would be much more well-rounded in the sections that you have edited. Also, I would recommend that you add more description to smaller linked topics throughout your additions to improve readability. If you could give brief explanations into the topics that you cover throughout the sections you have edited, it would allow the reader to continue on with your writing more fluidly, without having to constantly stop to look up a link. However, the links that you have provided are very helpful. Great job on these edits! Annkat22 (talk) 04:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
polyandry in hinduism
- So you are making up conclusion after reading a website that has provided some translation of text? That's WP:OR. You need such interpretation to be supported by a reliable source. Also stop repeating what has been already noted on Women in Hinduism#The Epics. Capitals00 (talk) 14:49, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
capital! please review it is not just translation. text along with sources is below. it is a well known published source.
There is at least one reference to polyandry in the ancient Hindu epic Mahabharata. Draupadi married the five Pandava brothers, as this is what she chose in a previous life. This ancient text is accepting this as her way of life. However, in the same epic, when questioned by Kunti to give an example of polyandry, Yudhishthira cites Gautam-clan Jatila (married to seven Saptarishis) and Hiranyaksha's sister Pracheti (married to ten brothers), thereby implying a more open attitude toward polyandry in Vedic society.ot
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Article in POV shambles
This article has certainly been tainted by a lot of POV. While the first line may say there is conflict on position of women in Hindu texts, most of the article omits any reference to something that might be deemed negative. Many times it diverted to containing contradictory or unsourced text.
Now earlier  the article claimed Sati did not exist until the 2nd millennium CE. Despite sources like Brick David's "The Dharmasastric Debate on Widow Burning" p. 205 and Anand A. Yang's "Women and Social Reform in Modern India: A Reader" (pages 20-21) mentioning its existence in first millenium CE. ALso it earlier used Narada Smriti to claim Hindu scriptures do not prescribe punishment for adultery.
Brick David also mentions sati as sahgamana, where a wife sacrifices herself on pyre: "It is, therefore, fairly certainly that sahagamana was a Brahmanical custom current in at least parts of Kashmir during second half of first millennium CE."
Anand A. Yang describes it started becoming popular later in 1st millennium: "Increasingly, however, in the first millennium AD, for instance, in the popular texts of later Hinduism, the Puranas, sati is mentioned as an option for widows."
We should also add to this the fact that earliest evidences of Sati are far older than second millennium, dating as far as 5th century in Nepal and 6th century in India. Widow-burning is documented by Megasthenes too.
The article also unncessarily included theories about Sati. Most of all it only included one in detail, the Muslim invasions to suggest this practice only took root during the period of conquests. "The earliest Islamic invasions of South Asia have been recorded from early 8th century CE, such as the raids of Muhammad bin Qasim, and major wars of Islamic expansion after the 10th century. This chronology has led to the theory that the increase in sati practice in India may be related to the centuries of Islamic invasion and its expansion in South Asia."
I did not find any mention of sati or dowry in Volume 100 of "Encyclopaedia Indica: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh". But the text was copied from an earlier version of the article Sati (practice),  and the book is only available for a snippet view, being very expensive, I doubt anyone actually read it. Andre Wink never mentions Sati in "Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam: 7th-11th Centuries". No other theory that may say another thing was mentioned, this clearly shows this was a POV-infected section.
Further this article under the part about "Adultery" claimed that Hindu texts contain no punishment for adultery. Contrary to this I know that many of them do, including Narada Smriti itself as said so by Upinder Singh . This is the same scripture used here earlier to claim
Another book "Irreverence and the Sacred: Critical Studies in the History of Religions" Hugh Urban & Greg Johnson mentions far worse punishments existent in Arthashastra and some Dhamsastras, inluding capital punishment.