User talk:Geraldo Perez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Missing production companies[edit]

I know they aren't even listed on their respective pages (e.g. Raven's Home, Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn, Best Friends Whenever, Kickin' It, etc) and I always try to add them there, but you keep reverting. Here are some proof for you that they are ACTUAL production companies. I put some CLG Wiki links so you can find these logos on which shows they appear on (See "Availability" on those respective pages). I also wanted you to read this aswell before we can ACTUALLY put those companies on these shows' respective Wikipedia pages.

2001:8003:1C6E:6200:D77:8DFB:B10F:5FD1 (talk) 23:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

None of these links are reliable since all of them are full of user-generated contents under the guise of a repository for many end cards through TV film and even games just like the original which most likely had shut down in the middle of last year I believe. IJBall would rather take a closer peek at that.

Alright, I'll send it over to him, thanks :) 2001:8003:1C6E:6200:39EE:EED5:CD93:63EC (talk) 04:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

henry danger production codes changes[edit]

All the other wikipedia pages has these production codes related for those episodes! (Redacted) Cezar Teodosiu (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

@Cezar teodosiu: We go with sourced content. Other articles being wrong don't set a precedent. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

2804:D49 (etc.) range[edit]

I know they've had a focus mainly on TV articles and I've seen you revert/warn them multiple times. Just letting you know I've opened an ANI discussion regarding this range at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent WP:DE IP range. Magitroopa (talk) 21:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Jessie (2011 TV series)[edit]

Is this even necessary? Don't we need at least 12 articles to be part of a template or category before creating? Second, based on the category name, only the main Jessie page and its List of Jessie episodes page would belong, which would make the category even more pointless. And, actually, only the parent article Jessie should be listed there based on the name, as per User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 24#Template:That's So Raven. I imagine what you said—in a diff I have linked in that message—applies to categories as well, not just templates. Amaury • 17:12, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

@Amaury: The category isn't needed. It is an WP:EPONYMOUS category as well so what should be in it are thing about what is main page topic. Stuff about other shows doesn't belong as this category is WP:NOTDEFINING for them. Should be pruned and nominated for deletion at WP:CFD. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Will need more eyes at the relevant articles. BRD still applies. At work, so can't do much. Amaury • 02:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

List of Victorious characters[edit]

I've been seeing recent additions to the Minor characters section, like [1]. I'm looking at this section and going "Whoa! This is too big." It is clearly larger in the prose (as well as the table of contents) than either the main or recurring cast/characters sections. This looks like a section that can be seriously trimmed or removed altogether, though some mention of special appearances (like Jeanette McCurdy in the "Ponnie" season 3 episode) might be OK if brief. Thoughts? Pinging Amaury and IJBall. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Will correct myself on the lengths of each section ... the minor characters is slightly smaller than the main characters (just slightly over 6 pages worth of scrolling in my browser, vs. 6 1/2 for the main characters), but nevertheless still a bit large. The recurring section is quite a bit smaller than either of the other two. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
MPFitz1968: Yes – the subsections should be removed there, and that should be converted to a bulleted list in which these minor characters get one sentence, two at the most! of descriptive prose. Something like List of Black Lightning characters#Guest stars should be the rough template for 'Guest cast' sections at LoC articles like this. --IJBall (contribstalk) 18:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Also, it's worth noting that the IP in question,, has done nothing but a series of disruptive edits to this article, and Sam & Cat. I would suggest that, if they keep this up, they should probably be reported. --IJBall (contribstalk) 21:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

New message from Amaury[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 April 21 § Category:Jessie (2011 TV series). @IJBall and MPFitz1968: Inviting you as well. Amaury • 20:38, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Question on categories[edit]

Should categories added to articles be based only on the country of origin and original network? For example, Backstage (Canadian TV series). More specifically, its episode list. Would the category Category:Lists of Disney Channel television series episodes, which isn't currently listed there, still be appropriate since Disney Channel acquired the rights to air it or is that category only appropriate for Disney Channel originals? For example, something like Liv and Maddie, in which case, it shouldn't be added to the Backstage episode list? Amaury • 20:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

@Amaury: Generally foreign broadcasts shouldn't be considered defining, but this one is mentioned in the lead and has a column in the episode list for air dates, so seems appropriate for this article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
(edit conflict)  Done Amaury • 21:00, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Another question: Something like Category:2010s American children's comedy television series clearly supersedes Category:American children's comedy television series, so only one or the other should be listed in an article, not both. However, it should preferably be the former one since it's more specific, of course. Likewise for something like Category:2010s Nickelodeon original programming and Category:Nickelodeon original programming—only one should be listed, and it should preferably be the former.
This is my question, and I hope it makes sense: If a program runs into the next decade—Henry Danger being one of a few clear examples—such as premiering in the 2010s, but ending in the 2020s, should we list both Category:2010s Nickelodeon original programming and Category:2020s Nickelodeon original programming, or should we still list only Category:2010s Nickelodeon original programming since that's when it premiered? Or would it be better to simply just have the more broad Category:Nickelodeon original programming in a case like this and avoid the issue altogether? Amaury • 22:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
@Amaury: Generally list both decades as aired in both. Like what The Casagrandes has done. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. Amaury • 22:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


Is this appropriate?... I've never seen this done before, and I worry about the WP:COPYVIO implications. Thanks. --IJBall (contribstalk) 12:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@IJBall: It is as appropriate as any free-use image would be for an article if it adds value to that article, which is an editorial decision. I am extremely surprised that Nickelodeon released this under a free-use license on YouTube, but it appears they did. Pretty much all the videos on that YouTube channel are licensed free-use and the channel does appear to be owned by Nickelodeon so they have the right to do that. I wonder if some low level functionally made a mistake on the license. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:36, 22 April 2021 (UTC)