User talk:Mikeluhghthv7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

March 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, List of political parties in the Republic of Ireland. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Be patient, your article will be approved or denied eventually. --Belwine (talk) 15:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


Can you verify this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Liberal_Socialist_Congress

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Mikeluhghthv7. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Caius G. (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liberal Socialist Congress (March 2)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mikeluhghthv7! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Hi. And welcome to the project. Thanks for your contributions to date. While all constructive contributions are welcome, you may wish to take a quick look at the relevant content and editing guidelines. Including:

  • WP:TOOSOON - In some cases it may be too soon to create an article (or to add content to an existing article). If an organisation was only formed today, then it may be that there hasn't been enough coverage to either confirm that it exists or is notable.
  • WP:VER - All content should be verifiable. And based on reliable sources. Edits and articles which do not rely on verifiable and reliable sources do not meet this expectation. You might also want to note that, "user generated content" (like a Twitter post) is generally not considered reliable. Anyone can create a Twitter account and post almost anything to that account.
  • WP:EWLO - As you've gone to the trouble of creating an account, please do use it. "Editing while logged out" causes a few issues that are best (and easily) avoided.
  • WP:CON - Wikipedia relies on a consensus editing approach. Consensus is often clarified through discussion. As you may note on the relevant Talk page thread, the consensus is that only political parties with articles should be listed on that article. As any small group can describe themselves as a "political party", unless or until the notability of that organisation has been established, they shouldn't be listed. Otherwise that list would be infinite.

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 17:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)