User talk:Therapyisgood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Therapyisgood, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 02:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Use of multiple accounts[edit]

Hi Therapyisgood. Are either Dog Hole Cave or Buchanan3 you? --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 15:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

FAC[edit]

We're done. Can will you make your decision? LittleJerry (talk) 01:46, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Therapyisgood is  Confirmed to

These accounts do not qualify for any kind of privacy reasons. Under WP:VALIDALT, Privacy, "Although a privacy-based alternative account is not publicly connected to your main account, it should not be used in ways outlined in the inappropriate uses section of this page, and if it is, the account may be publicly linked to your main account for sanctions" Under WP:PROJSOCK which is in the inappropriate uses section of that page, Editing project space "Undisclosed alternative accounts are not to be used in discussions internal to the project." You may not use multiple accounts to edit the project namespace...anything beginning in Wikipedia or Wikipedia talk. That includes RfAs or anything listed under "Wikipedia:Featured list candidates" also.

Your complaints are invalid...all of it. That includes the baloney about being locked out of your account so that you just had to create Buchanan3 to edit that RfA. Garbage.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Email[edit]

Thanks for your email, not really my territory as it involves a checkuser block. You could go to Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System though. ϢereSpielChequers 18:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Lewis (baseball)[edit]

Hi Therapyisgood - I would agree about "a Major League Baseball" but when you reduce it to MBA the first sound is an "em" which takes "an".
A search of Wikipedia articles for "an MLB" gives 649 matches - whereas a search for "a MLB" gives 5 matches - including Lewis (baseball) and four quotations, which we don't change, even though they are wrong. I'll leave you to revert yourself - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Disagree. I go on what's right, not the number of search results. Therapyisgood (talk) 19:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
So, 650 people (649 plus me) are wrong, and you are right? - sounds unlikely
You probably don't want to read this - although I couldn't find an example for MLB - it does cover NBC - it is the sound, not the letter. - Arjayay (talk) 19:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Again the number of people saying something is totally and wholly irrelevant. However here and here seem to indicate the acronym's article is based on how it sounds, so I'll change it back. Regards. Therapyisgood (talk) 19:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for doing that - happy editing - Arjayay (talk) 20:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Account restriction (User:Therapyisgood)[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Due to recent misuse of multiple accounts, Therapyisgood (talk · contribs) is indefinitely restricted to editing with one account.

Support: Joe Roe, Maxim, SoWhy, Casliber, Bradv, Beeblebrox

Oppose:

Recuse:

For the Arbitration Committee, – Joe (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Account restriction (User:Therapyisgood)

DYK nomination of Lewis (baseball)[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Lewis (baseball) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

ANI[edit]

I have summarily closed the discussion you recently opened at WP:ANI as I believe your complaint to be without merit. Where possible please pursue other forms of dispute resolution before coming to ANI, which should generally be a last resort. A look at the diffs you linked left me with a strong conviction that you were over-reacting. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Lewis (baseball)[edit]

Updated DYK query.svgOn 26 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lewis (baseball), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lewis (first name unknown) pitched in his only Players' League game in 1890 and gave up 20 runs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lewis (baseball). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lewis (baseball)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Well done![edit]

Barnstar nature.png Nature Barnstar
To Therapyisgood, thanks for the impressive expansion of Markham's storm petrel. Cheers, Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: Really appreciate it. Therapyisgood (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/What's a Nice Girl Like You Doing in a Place Like This?/archive2[edit]

I would appreciate your thoughts on this. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Markham's storm petrel[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Markham's storm petrel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 21:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Markham's storm petrel[edit]

Updated DYK query.svgOn 6 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Markham's storm petrel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Markham's storm petrel, which nests in Peru and northern Chile, has been described as "one of the least known seabirds in the world"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Markham's storm petrel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Markham's storm petrel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Edward Thomas Daniell FAC[edit]

Hi Therapyisgood, Thanks for your comments on the article, which I've now addressed. Would you mind returning to the comments to say you're happy that I've responded to your suggestions? Thanks. Amitchell125 (talk) 12:34, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Chris Gragg[edit]

I am thinking about moving the Chris Gragg article to WP:FAR and posted this section on the talk page. Any feedback you have would be much appreciated. Tonystewart14 (talk) 23:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

I have nominated Chris Gragg for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Tonystewart14 (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Markham's storm petrel[edit]

The article Markham's storm petrel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Markham's storm petrel for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Markham's storm petrel[edit]

The article Markham's storm petrel you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Markham's storm petrel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Willie Mays[edit]

Thanks for your comments on the Willie Mays peer review! I applied your suggestions, and I just nominated it for featured article status, so feel free to comment! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)